MDMoh DianMohammad Hassan Mohammadian · Realtor®

Park Lake Residences twin towers at 1900 and 1910 Lake Shore Boulevard West

Lake Shore / High Park building intelligence · September 2026

Park Lake Residences: a 29% raw median drop is not a usable building-wide rate.

Only seven sales fall inside the matched Jan. 1-Sep. 20 windows, and there is no strict tower + bedroom + reported-size product cell that repeats across both years. This guide keeps the raw numbers visible, then separates what can and cannot support a unit-level decision.

By Moh Dian · Data through September 20, 2026

3 sales in 20254 in 2026TSCC 2129

When two towers sell different products, don't invent a trend

Park Lake's median fell 29%. But what if no truly comparable suite sold in both years?

Imagine a buyer considering a one-bedroom at 1900 Lake Shore and a seller of a larger suite at 1910. One might hope for a 29% discount; the other might fear their condo lost 29% in value. The historical 2025–2026 sample contains only seven completed sales and no strict same-tower, same-bedroom, same-size-and-style repeat cell. That makes a headline complex median a poor valuation tool for either home. These are illustrative people and choices, not currently available listings.

For a buyer

Use the closest comparable, but label its differences.

The 2026 cohort had four sales, including two 575 ft² one-bedrooms, while the 2025 cohort had just three sales at 1910 Lake Shore. A 1910 same-bedroom pair with close exact areas is useful context but belongs to different reported size bands.

Next check: Match the exact tower, finished area, floor, view, bedroom configuration and fees. Confirm current TSCC 2129 documents, and widen the comparable search transparently only when same-product evidence is absent.

Check the real resale condo purchase process →

For an owner considering a sale

No repeat cells means no defensible complex-wide percentage.

A raw median approximately 29% lower was driven largely by tower and suite mix. One historical 2026 sale took 184 days, so even a short median marketing time does not describe every listing's experience.

Next check: Review similar completed units at your own tower, then nearby compatible towers only with documented adjustments; calculate actual costs, demand and live competition before settling on asking price.

Estimate net proceeds and holding costs →

Three questions that matter more than a raw percentage

Which tower—1900 or 1910 Lake Shore—and which reported and exact floor area actually match this suite?
Is the proposed comparable from a similar physical product, or does it differ in size band, bedrooms, floor, parking or view?
Have I reviewed current fees and corporation documents, and am I treating a thin sample as context rather than a forecast?

The original seven verified 2025–2026 transactions and corporation identifiers remain unchanged. There is no strict tower-bedroom-size-style repeat cell across years. The minus-29% complex median is a different-product historical observation, not a current suite valuation.

2026 resale snapshot

Four verified sales—and a product mix that changed sharply.

2025 turnover was entirely at 1910 Lake Shore. In 2026, two sales occurred at 1900 and two at 1910, including two 575 sq. ft. one-bedrooms. That makes the combined median highly mix-sensitive.

4Verified 2026 sales

$497KRaw 2026 median

15 daysMedian DOM

3 / 4Sold within 30 days

$742Median sold / exact ft²

7 / 7Exact-area coverage

Completed sales are not listing supply or a sell-through rate. The 2026 sample also contains one 184-day sale, so the short median does not mean every unit moved quickly.

Headline versus evidence

The raw median fell 29%. There is no strict repeated-product cell to validate that rate.

$700K → $497K

Raw complex median: −29.0%.

No strict repeat

No same-tower + bedroom + reported-size + style cell appears in both years.

$775 → $742

Broad median sold / exact reported ft²: about −4.3%.

38 → 15 days

Raw median DOM, with one 184-day 2026 outlier.

The 29% raw median decline is dominated by product and address mix. It should not be applied to a Park Lake suite as an annual appreciation/depreciation figure.

Closest same-tower sensitivity

A 1910 one-bedroom pair is useful context—but still not a strict match.

The closest repeat is same tower and same bedroom count with exact areas within about 5%, but the reported MLS size bands differ.

$540K2025 · 605 exact ft²

$430K2026 · 575 exact ft²

−20.4%Total-price change

$893 → $748Approx. exact $/ft²

−16.2%Exact-area $/ft² change

38 → 16Days on market

MLS W12326709 versus W13112894. The exact-area gap is about 5%, but floor, exposure, view, parking and condition can still differ materially. Treat this as pair-level sensitivity only.

Address mix

1900 had no matched-period sale in 2025, then two in 2026.

That alone is enough to break a naive year-over-year complex median. The two addresses share TSCC 2129, but the sold units entering each yearly sample are not comparable in composition.

1900 Lake Shore0 → 2 sales

2025 median: n/a
2026 median: $493.6K
2026 DOM median: 99 days

1910 Lake Shore3 → 2 sales

2025 median: $700K
2026 median: $640K
2026 DOM median: 14 days

The 1900 median is especially misleading because one 575 sq. ft. one-bedroom and one 970 sq. ft. two-bedroom are the entire 2026 sample.

Exact-area & carrying-cost context

All seven sales have exact area, but broad medians still reflect different suite mixes.

Exact-area coverage is unusually good here. The limitation is not missing area—it is the lack of repeated physical product across the two matched windows.

$7752025 broad median sold / ft²

$7422026 broad median sold / ft²

−4.3%Broad exact-area median change

$0.9512025 median maintenance / exact ft²

$0.8872026 median maintenance / exact ft²

100%Exact-area and fee coverage

Historical listing-reported maintenance is screening context only. Current fees, reserve fund, insurance, litigation and special-assessment information should be verified from current corporation documents.

Complex identity

1900 and 1910 Lake Shore are one TSCC 2129 complex.

Public building references identify Park Lake Residences as a two-tower Pemberton development completed around 2010, with 278 suites in total. Public sources describe the towers as approximately 18 and 19 storeys and identify TSCC 2129, registered December 22, 2010.

1900Lake Shore Blvd W

1910Lake Shore Blvd W

2129TSCC

278Public-reference suites

All seven broker full sheets in the locked matched-period cohort carry corporation number 2129, although the raw prefix varies between TSCC and TSCP.

Verified Park Lake photography

Two glass towers linked by a low-rise podium beside High Park and the lake.

These images come from verified 2026 sold listings and show building and suite context only.

Park Lake Residences twin-tower exterior — Park Lake Residences twin towers

1900 Lake Shore Boulevard West exterior at Park Lake Residences — 1900 Lake Shore exterior

Representative Park Lake Residences sold-unit interior with lake view — Representative verified 1910 interior

REALM listing photography from MLS® W12389704, W13112894 and W13666792; source brokerage watermarks preserved.

Lake view from a verified Park Lake Residences sale

Lake Shore / High Park context

Older than Mirabella, but directly adjacent to the same waterfront/park corridor.

For unit-level valuation I would stay inside TSCC 2129 first, then widen toward Mirabella, NXT or Windermere only after controlling for age, exact area, floor, exposure, view, parking, locker and condition.

Mirabella 1926 & 1928 Lake Shore →NXT 103 & 105 The Queensway →15 Windermere →Toronto area guide →

Methodology

How the Park Lake cohort was built.

1. Scope. Exact numeric street-number searches isolated sold Condo Apt records at 1900 and 1910 Lake Shore Boulevard West for January 1-September 20 in 2025 and 2026.

2. Full-sheet verification. All seven qualifying broker full sheets were re-opened before the evidence lock. Sold date, exact area, maintenance, corporation field, parking and other source fields were preserved.

3. No manufactured matched rate. There is no common tower + bedroom + reported-size + style cell across the two years, so no modelled complex-wide matched percentage is reported.

4. Near-size sensitivity. The 1910 one-bedroom comparison is shown separately because exact areas are within about 5%, but it is explicitly not labelled a strict match.

5. Exact-area context. Exact area is populated on all seven sheets. The broad $/ft² median is still mix-sensitive because the actual suite set changes between periods.

Sources & verification

Transaction evidence first; public sources for complex identity.

Condos.ca — Park Lake Residences / TSCC 2129 building reference↗CondoInvestments — Pemberton / 278-suite / 2010 building reference↗

FAQ

Questions buyers and owners ask about Park Lake Residences.

What sold at Park Lake Residences in 2026?

From January 1 through September 20, 2026, I verified four completed Condo Apt sales: two at 1900 Lake Shore and two at 1910 Lake Shore. The raw complex median was $497,000, but the product mix is very different from the three 2025 sales.

Did Park Lake Residences prices fall in 2026?

The raw matched-period median moved from $700,000 in 2025 to $497,000 in 2026, about 29% lower. I do not use that as a building-wide annual rate because 2025 had only three sales, all at 1910, while 2026 included two smaller 1900 sales and no strict tower + bedroom + reported-size cell repeats across both years.

Is there any near-like-for-like comparison?

The closest same-tower one-bedroom sensitivity is 1910 Lake Shore: a 605 sq. ft. sale at $540,000 in 2025 versus a 575 sq. ft. sale at $430,000 in 2026. Total price is about 20.4% lower and exact-area price per square foot about 16.2% lower, but the units are not identical and the pair should not be generalized.

What was exact-area pricing in the sample?

All seven broker sheets have exact finished area. The broad median sold price per exact reported square foot was about $775 in 2025 and $742 in 2026, roughly 4.3% lower. Because the yearly mix differs and there are no strict repeated cells, this is context rather than a matched building trend.

What condominium corporation is Park Lake Residences?

All seven verified broker sheets carry corporation number 2129. Public building references identify the complex at 1900 and 1910 Lake Shore Boulevard West as TSCC 2129, registered in 2010.

Did Park Lake condo prices really fall 29% in 2026?

The mixed historical 2025–2026 raw median was roughly 29% lower, but only seven completed sales were observed and the units changed across the two towers and sizes. No strict comparable product group repeated across both years. A 1910 one-bedroom pair provides limited extra context; neither measure establishes the depreciation of an individual condo.

Unit-level Park Lake analysis

Comparing a condo at 1900 or 1910 Lake Shore?

Send me the listing or unit number. I can narrow the evidence by exact area, layout, floor, exposure, lake/park view, parking, locker, condition and current TSCC 2129 documents instead of applying the raw complex median.