MDMoh DianMohammad Hassan Mohammadian · Realtor®

Lakeside Place condominium context at 2067 Lake Shore Boulevard West

Mimico waterfront building intelligence · September 2026

Lakeside Place had one matched-period sale in 2025—and none in 2026.

That does not produce a price trend. It produces a thin-turnover problem: buyers and owners need to widen the comparable search carefully without mixing apartment and townhouse product.

By Moh Dian · exact-address REALM review at 2067 Lake Shore Blvd W

1 sale in 20250 in 2026TSCC 1454

Almost no turnover means a different research plan

No condo sold here in the matched 2026 period. How should a buyer or seller estimate value?

Imagine a family considering Lakeside Place and a long-time owner who wants to sell. Neither can rely on a building-wide 2026 sold median: the locked historical window had zero completed 2026 sales, versus only one in 2025. The 2025 example was a 1,027 ft² two-bedroom plus den, not a universal comparison for every unit. There is a useful way forward, but it starts with suitable older and nearby sales rather than invented price changes. These are illustrative clients, not an actual offer.

For a buyer

One old sale gives context, not a reliable offer formula.

The sole matched-period 2025 sale was $650,000 for a 1,027 ft² two-bedroom-plus-den. With no matched 2026 sale, there is no honest year-over-year price rate or resale speed estimate for the building.

Next check: Inspect the exact suite, status certificate, parking/locker rights and current fees; widen backward to comparable same-building units and then nearby genuinely comparable condos with explicit adjustments.

Check the condo documents and offer conditions →

For an owner considering listing

Thin resale activity is not proof that prices are rising or falling.

The single $650,000 historical sale took 41 days and reported $1,409 in monthly maintenance. Neither its sale price nor its carrying costs represent the current state of every Lakeside Place suite.

Next check: Obtain the current corporation budget, compare the most similar historical same-building sale first, then widen carefully by age, layout, floor and location. Plan selling costs and evaluate actual new competing listings.

Estimate your net sale proceeds →

What to do when a building is too quiet for a median

Is the proposed comparable the same condo-apartment product and suite size, rather than a townhouse or unrelated tower?
Have you reviewed recent same-building history outside the matched year and adjusted for differences carefully?
What is the actual unit's current monthly fee and status-certificate position, rather than an archived 2025 fee?

There is just one verified 2025 completed sale and no 2026 completed sales in the locked matching periods. All exact-area, maintenance and DOM observations are limited to that isolated example. A trend or price-growth percentage would be unjustified.

Matched-period snapshot

The correct result is “insufficient same-building turnover,” not a percentage change.

The Jan. 1-Sep. 20 matched windows return one completed apartment sale in 2025 and zero completed sales in 2026.

1 → 0Matched-period completed sales

$650K2025 matched-period sale

41 daysDOM for the 2025 sale

1,027 ft²Exact finished area

~$633/ft²Exact sold price / ft²

$1,409/moHistorical maintenance on that sale

No 2026 completed sale means there is no defensible matched building appreciation rate. Active asking prices are not substituted for sold evidence.

Why this still matters

Thin turnover changes the valuation method.

Same-building first

Use the last physically comparable Lakeside Place sales before reaching outside the building.

Time before geography

Widen backward in time before widening to a different corporation with different fees and amenities.

Apartment ≠ townhouse

TSCC 1454 includes townhouse-style product that should not be casually merged with apartment suites.

Asks ≠ sales

An active listing can show seller expectations, but it cannot replace a completed transaction.

The matched-period anchor

Unit 202 is the only completed same-window sale.

The full broker sheet was reopened and verified after a targeted retrieval retry.

Sale result$650,000

Sold date: Sep. 3, 2025
List price: $674,900
DOM: 41 days
Sale/list: ~96%

Physical product2+1 · 1,027 ft²

Style: Apartment
Reported band: 1,000–1,199
Exposure: Southeast
Parking / locker: 1 / 1 owned

Carrying cost$1,409/mo

Observed intensity: ~$1.37/ft²/mo
Water / heat: Included
CAC / insurance: Included
Parking / common: Included

The 2026 gap

Zero matched-period sales is evidence about liquidity—not evidence of price direction.

A building can have interested buyers and active inventory while still producing no completed transaction in a fixed comparison window.

0Completed 2026 matched-period sales

No trendYear-over-year price change

No matched DOM2026 completed-sale liquidity metric

Do not imputeFrom asks, estimates or neighbouring towers

Building identity

Lakeside Place is the former Players Club at 2067 Lake Shore.

Public building references identify Intracorp as the developer, registration in 2002, roughly 13 storeys, approximately 92–93 units and corporation TSCC 1454. Some public sources and historical listings still use the Players Club name.

2067Lake Shore Blvd W

TSCC 1454Corporation

2002Public registration / completion reference

~92–93Public unit-count references

Verified listing context

The matched-period sale shows a boutique-style apartment product with substantial private outdoor space.

These images come directly from the verified 2025 sale used in the analysis.

Interior of the verified 2025 Lakeside Place sale at 2067 Lake Shore — Verified 2025 matched-period interior

Private terrace and barbecue area at Lakeside Place — Private terrace / BBQ context

Preserved REALM listing photography from MLS® W12304147; original brokerage watermarks retained.

Lakeside Place at 2067 Lake Shore in the Humber Bay waterfront corridor

Humber Bay waterfront context

A small building between Palace Pier and Waterford behaves differently from the larger towers around it.

Public references list concierge, party / meeting space, visitor parking, gym / fitness, indoor pool / whirlpool, sauna and terrace / BBQ amenities. The same corporation also contains townhouse-style product, which makes product separation essential when comps are scarce.

Palace Pier →Waterford Towers →Palace Place →Humber Bay Shores guide →Building directory →

When same-building comps are scarce

How I would value a Lakeside Place unit.

1. Start with the latest physically comparable Lakeside Place sales. Exact area, layout, floor, exposure, terrace/balcony, parking and locker matter.

2. Widen backward in time before widening to another building. A two-year-old same-building comp can be more informative than a recent sale in a very different corporation.

3. Keep townhouse product separate. Multi-level TSCC 1454 townhouses trade as a different physical product from apartment suites.

4. Use nearby towers only with explicit adjustments. Palace Pier and Waterford differ in age, scale, fee structure, suite mix and amenity profile.

5. Treat active asks as negotiation context only. They are not completed-sale evidence.

Methodology

How this Lakeside Place analysis was built.

1. Exact-address pull. REALM was queried for all sold residential condominium product at exactly 2067 Lake Shore Blvd W in matching Jan. 1-Sep. 20 windows.

2. Broad product screen. The query intentionally allowed apartment and townhouse / multi-level product so unlike product could be identified rather than silently omitted.

3. Matched result. One qualifying apartment sale appears in 2025 and zero completed sales appear in 2026.

4. Broker-sheet verification. The 2025 full sheet was reopened and verified for sold date, sold price, DOM, corporation, exact finished area, maintenance, exposure, parking, locker and fee inclusions.

5. No imputation. No 2026 sale price, DOM, $/ft² or appreciation rate is inferred from active inventory, automated estimates or neighbouring towers.

Sources & verification

REALM transaction evidence first; public sources for building identity and amenities.

Condos.ca — Lakeside Place / TSCC 1454↗Players Club / Lakeside Place building reference↗

FAQ

Questions buyers and owners ask about Lakeside Place.

How many Lakeside Place sales are in the matched 2025 vs 2026 sample?

One qualifying sale appears between Jan. 1 and Sep. 20, 2025, and no completed sale appears in the same 2026 window. That is too little evidence for a meaningful year-over-year building appreciation rate.

What was the matched-period Lakeside Place sale?

Unit 202 sold for $650,000 on Sep. 3, 2025 after 41 days on market. The broker sheet reports 2+1 bedrooms, 1,027 exact finished sq. ft., southeast exposure, one owned parking space and one owned locker.

What was the maintenance fee on that sale?

The verified broker sheet reports $1,409 per month, or about $1.37 per exact finished sq. ft. per month. The sheet marks water, heat, central air, building insurance, parking and common elements as included. Current fees and inclusions still need current documents.

Why not compare the 2025 sale with an active 2026 listing?

An active asking price is not a completed market transaction. Using an unsold listing as if it were a sale would blur asking strategy with actual buyer acceptance.

Does Lakeside Place include townhouse-style product?

Yes. Public building records identify townhouse-style units at the same address and TSCC 1454. Those multi-level homes should be separated from apartment-style condo comps.

How should a Lakeside Place unit be valued when same-building sales are scarce?

Start with the last physically comparable same-building sales, widen backward in time before widening to other buildings, and only then use nearby waterfront buildings with explicit adjustments for corporation, age, exact area, layout, view, maintenance, parking, locker and amenities.

Does zero Lakeside Place condo sales in 2026 mean values fell?

No. The locked January–September 2026 sample found no completed condo sales at 2067 Lake Shore, and only one in the matching 2025 window. With that little turnover, a building-wide price trend cannot be calculated; compare the exact unit with suitable historical same-building sales and nearby product, documenting every adjustment.

Thin-turnover comp analysis

Comparing a condo at 2067 Lake Shore?

Send me the listing or unit number. I can build a comp set in the correct order: same-building physical matches first, older same-building evidence next, then carefully adjusted nearby waterfront sales.